Gay marriage is not some sideline issue, it is the marriage debate. Losing it means losing marriage as a social institution, a shared public norm. Marriage will become (as it is in Sweden) a religious rite, with little public or social significance. As a legal institution, marriage will lose its coherence. By embracing gay marriage the legal establishment will have declared that the public purposes of marriage no longer include anything to do with making babies, or giving children mothers and fathers. Legitimating same-sex marriage amounts to an official declaration that "What counts is not family structure, but the quality of dedication, commitment, self-sacrifice, and love in the household." Family structure does not count. Marriage in this view is merely expressive personal conduct, a declaration of love between two adults. As such there is no reason for the state to be involved in preferring marriage as a family form.The question is not whether this is a battle we can win, but whether it is a battle we can afford to lose.
Maggie Gallagher
"The Stakes: Why We Need Marriage"
National Review Online. July 14, 2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment